Skip to main content

WHITE v. BEAVER COUNTY

W.D. Pa.July 9, 2020No. 2:17-cv-00998
Plaintiff WinBeaver County$28,803.5 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff William White, a county employee, prevailed in his Fair Labor Standards Act claim and was awarded $2,342 in stipulated damages plus $26,461.50 in attorney's fees after jury trial found him to be an employee of Beaver County.

What This Ruling Means

**White v. Beaver County Employment Case Summary** **What Happened** A worker named White filed an appeal against the Board of Trustees of Allen Township regarding an employment dispute. The case involved claims that required following specific procedural steps, including requesting an administrative record from the lower court. However, White failed to properly request this required documentation during the appeal process. **What the Court Decided** Both the trial court and appeals court ruled against White. The courts dismissed the case because White did not follow the proper legal procedures - specifically failing to request the administrative record that was required by law. The appeals court also found that White's claims for trespass and requests for court orders to stop certain actions were not valid legal claims that could succeed in court. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights how important it is for workers to follow exact procedural requirements when appealing employment decisions through the courts. Missing even seemingly small administrative steps can result in losing your entire case, regardless of whether you might have had valid complaints against your employer. Workers should work with experienced employment attorneys who understand these technical requirements to avoid having their cases thrown out on procedural grounds.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.