Skip to main content
Retail

7-Eleven, Inc.

64 federal employment cases from public court records (20102026)

6 with a published ruling · 58 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list 7-Eleven, Inc. as an employer in 64 employment matters between 2010 and 2026.

Of the 5 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were dismissed.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 20% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination and Wage Theft.

Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in NY.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

64
Federal Cases
20%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

3
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

7-Eleven, Inc. appears in 5 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Wrongful Termination (2 of 5), Wage Theft. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination and Wage Theft.

Rulings span New York (1), Pennsylvania (1), California (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings, Pennsylvania rulings and California rulings.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3 (60%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (20%)
Dismissed
1 (20%)

Claim Types

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
D. Colo. · Mar 2026
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven Inc
N.D. Tex. · Dec 2025
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
S.D. Cal. · Aug 2025 · California
Dismissed
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
D. Colo. · May 2025
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
D.S.C. · Apr 2025
Open docket
Employee v. Williams
S.D. Ohio · Oct 2024 · Massachusetts · Wrongful Termination
Open docket
Employee v. SCANTEK, INC.
E.D. Pa. · Sep 2024 · Pennsylvania · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
D. Colo. · Apr 2024
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
D. Mass. · Feb 2024
Open docket
Employee v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
S.D. Fla. · Sep 2023
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
M.D. Tenn. · Dec 2022
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
M.D. Pa. · Apr 2022
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · Aug 2021
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
E.D.N.Y. · May 2021
Open docket
Employee v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
D.D.C. · May 2021
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Nov 2020 · New York · Fair Labor Standards
Defendant Win
Employee v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
D.N.J. · Jan 2020
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
M.D. Pa. · Dec 2019
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
D. Mass. · Sep 2019
Open docket
Employee v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
W.D. Pa. · Aug 2019
Open docket
Employee v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
D.N.J. · Aug 2019
Open docket
Employee v. 7- Eleven, Inc.
M.D. Tenn. · Jun 2019
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · Dec 2018
Open docket
Employee v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
S.D.N.Y. · Dec 2018
Open docket
Employee v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
E.D.N.Y. · Jun 2018
Open docket
Showing 25 of 64

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.