Skip to main content
Insurance

ACE American Insurance Company

12 federal employment cases from public court records (20032024)

6 with a published ruling · 6 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list ACE American Insurance Company as an employer in 12 employment matters between 2003 and 2024.

Of the 6 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 ended in a ruling for the worker.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 17% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

12
Federal Cases
17%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

ACE American Insurance Company appears in 6 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the insurance sector, where claims-adjuster wage-and-hour disputes, age-discrimination, and whistleblower-retaliation claims are most common. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The case involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
4 (67%)
Remanded
1 (17%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (17%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued ACE American Insurance Company’s 6 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
5
Summary judgment
1

Of the 1 summary-judgment rulings, 0 ended the case in ACE American Insurance Company’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.

What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Claim Types

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Ace American Ins. Co.
Conn. · Dec 2024
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. ACE American Insurance Company
N.D. Ga. · Jan 2023
Open docket
Employee v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
D.N.J. · Nov 2022
Open docket
Employee v. ACE American Insurance Company as Successor of INA of Texas
Tex. App.—13th Dist. · Jun 2019 · Workers Compensation Benefits
Defendant Win
Employee v. ACE American Insurance Co.
N.D. Cal. · Jul 2018
Open docket
Employee v. Da Hua Hu, and ACE INA Insurance Company Canada, Defendants/Respondents.
Mo. Ct. App. · Jul 2014 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. ACE American Insurance
5th Circuit · Jun 2014 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Da Hua Hu, and ACE INA Insurance Company Canada, Defendants/Respondents.
Mo. Ct. App. · Apr 2014
Defendant Win
Employee v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
N.D. Fla. · Feb 2014
Open docket
Employee v. ACE Risk Evaluations, Inc
N.D. Tex. · Mar 2012
Open docket
Employee v. ACE Risk Evaluations, Inc
M.D. Fla. · Jan 2012
Open docket
Employee v. Adams
Cal. Ct. App. · Apr 2003
Remanded
Showing 12 of 12

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.