Advanced Care Staffing, LLC
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2019–2024)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Advanced Care Staffing, LLC as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2019 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Advanced Care Staffing, LLC appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Su v. Advanced Care Staffing, LLC (2024) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between a worker named Su and Advanced Care Staffing, LLC, a healthcare staffing company. Su filed a lawsuit claiming the company violated federal wage laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which suggests the company may have failed to pay proper wages or overtime compensation that Su wa… Read the ruling.
Kane v. Advanced Care Staffing, LLC (2023) — Mixed Result. A worker named Kane sued Advanced Care Staffing, LLC, claiming the company discriminated against him based on his national origin, failed to provide necessary workplace accommodations, retaliated against him for complaining, and created a hostile work environment. Read the ruling.
ROOD v. R&R EXPRESS, INC. (2019) — Remanded. This case involved an employee who blew the whistle on workplace problems and had a contract dispute with his employer. When the employer tried to force the case into private arbitration (instead of court), the employee objected because the arbitration agreement included a "loser pays" rule. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract, Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span New York (2), Pennsylvania (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings and Pennsylvania rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.