Skip to main content
Government & Public Sector

Central Intelligence Agency

12 federal employment cases from public court records (20052025)

12 with a published ruling

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Central Intelligence Agency as an employer in 12 employment matters between 2005 and 2025.

Of the 12 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 8 had a mixed result, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were dismissed, and 1 ended in a ruling for the worker.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 8% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Retaliation.

Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in DC.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

12
Federal Cases
8%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

5
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Central Intelligence Agency appears in 12 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 12), Wrongful Termination (3 of 12), Retaliation (2 of 12). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Retaliation.

Rulings span District of Columbia (6), New York (2), Florida (1), Virginia (1). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings, New York rulings, Florida rulings and Virginia rulings.

Case Outcomes

Mixed Result
8 (67%)
Defendant Win
2 (17%)
Dismissed
1 (8%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (8%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued Central Intelligence Agency’s 12 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
5 (42%)
Motion to dismiss
7 (58%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.