Charles River Laboratories Inc.
11 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2012–2025)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Charles River Laboratories Inc. as an employer in 11 distinct federal employment cases between 2012 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Breach Of Contract.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
About this employer
Charles River Laboratories Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Grimsley v. Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (2014) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee named Grimsley who sued Charles River Laboratories after being terminated. Grimsley claimed the company fired him because of his national origin (discrimination based on where he was from), broke their employment contract, and retaliated against him for complaining about workplace issues.… Read the ruling.
Grimsley v. Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (2012) — Defendant Win. A former employee at Charles River Laboratories filed a second lawsuit claiming he faced retaliation and discrimination based on his age and other protected characteristics after his first lawsuit against the company. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Retaliation, Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Breach of Contract.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.