Skip to main content
Government & Public Sector

Clark County, Nevada

23 federal employment cases from public court records (20022026)

23 with a published ruling

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Clark County, Nevada as an employer in 23 employment matters between 2002 and 2026.

Of the 23 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 10 were dismissed, 10 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 were sent back to a lower court, and 1 ended in a ruling for the worker.

Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 4% of matters with a recorded outcome.

The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, and Failure To Accommodate.

Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in NV.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

23
Federal Cases
4%
Plaintiff Win Rate

Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.

6
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Clark County, Nevada appears in 23 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Wrongful Termination (6 of 23), Discrimination (5 of 23). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination and Discrimination.

Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.

Rulings span Nevada (9), California (1), Alabama (1), Oregon (1). Nevada is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Nevada rulings, California rulings, Alabama rulings and Oregon rulings.

Case Outcomes

Dismissed
10 (43%)
Defendant Win
10 (43%)
Remanded
2 (9%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (4%)

Case Stages

The stage at which courts issued Clark County, Nevada’s 23 stage-identified rulings.

Appeal
8 (35%)
Summary judgment
6 (26%)

Of the 6 summary-judgment rulings, 6 ended the case in Clark County, Nevada’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.

Motion to dismiss
9 (39%)
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Summary judgment
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Diamond Sands Apartments, LLC v. Employee
9th Circuit · Jan 2026
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada
C.D. Cal. · Nov 2025 · California · Failure to Accommodate
Defendant Win
Employee v. Cogen
D. Md. · Aug 2025 · Maryland · Failure To Supervise
Dismissed
Employee v. Dunn
M.D. Ala. · Dec 2024 · Alabama · Discrimination
Dismissed
Employee v. Legacy Health
D. Or. · Dec 2024 · Oregon
Dismissed
Employee v. Mascaro
D.N.M. · Dec 2024 · New Mexico · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada
D. Nev. · Sep 2021 · Nevada · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County Nevada
D. Nev. · Feb 2021 · Nevada · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County Nevada
D. Nev. · Dec 2020 · Nevada · Wrongful Termination
Dismissed
Employee v. Clark County Nevada
D. Nev. · Dec 2020 · Nevada
Dismissed
Employee v. Clark County Nevada
D. Nev. · May 2020 · Nevada · Wrongful Termination
Dismissed
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada
D. Nev. · Jan 2020 · Nevada · Discrimination
Dismissed
Nevada Restaurant Servs., Inc. v. Employee
9th Circuit · Dec 2019
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County Nevada
D. Nev. · Oct 2019 · Nevada
Dismissed
Employee v. Clark County Nevada
D. Nev. · Sep 2019 · Nevada · Wrongful Termination
Dismissed
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada
9th Circuit · May 2013 · Wrongful Termination
Remanded
Employee v. Clark County
9th Circuit · Jun 2012 · Discrimination
Defendant Win
Employee v. Johnson
NEV · Sep 2005
Plaintiff Win
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada
D. Nev. · Jan 2005 · Nevada · Libel
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada
U.S. Supreme Court · Oct 2004
Dismissed
Employee v. Clark County
Wash. Ct. App. · Aug 2003
Defendant Win
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada Morgan Harris Thomas Rigsby
9th Circuit · Jul 2002
Remanded
Employee v. Clark County, Nevada Morgan Harris Thomas Rigsby
9th Circuit · Feb 2002 · Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Defendant Win
Showing 23 of 23

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.