Cleveland Clinic Foundation
29 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2026)
8 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 7 map to 7 distinct cases · 5 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Cleveland Clinic Foundation as an employer in 29 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2026.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in OH.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 7 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Cleveland Clinic Foundation appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
La Riccia v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. (2023) — Defendant Win. A patient filed a discrimination complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission against Cleveland Clinic Foundation, claiming the hospital discriminated against her because of her disability. Read the ruling.
Grim v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (2023) — Defendant Win. An employee filed a lawsuit against Cleveland Clinic Foundation claiming he was fired because of his race and that the employer retaliated against him for some protected activity. He also claimed his termination violated public policy. Read the ruling.
Adams v. Cleveland Clinic Florida (2022) — Plaintiff Win. This case involves a worker who filed a disability discrimination lawsuit against Cleveland Clinic Florida under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The employee, Adams, claimed that the hospital violated federal disability laws in how they handled an employment matter related to their disability. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 8), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 8), Wrongful Termination (2 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Wrongful Termination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.
Published opinions span Ohio (2), Florida (1). Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings and Florida rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in Cleveland Clinic Foundation’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.