Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2001–2015)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 2001 and 2015.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 6 ended in a ruling for the employer and 2 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate and Workers Compensation.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
About this employer
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Melvin Gilmore v. Director, Us Dept. Of Labor (2012) — Defendant Win. Melvin Gilmore filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Labor claiming the agency failed to accommodate his needs in connection with workers' compensation benefits. Gilmore wanted a court to review the Department of Labor's decision about his case. Read the ruling.
Christensen v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs (2009) — Plaintiff Win. Workers filed a complaint against the Office of Workers Compensation Programs, challenging how the agency calculated attorney fees in workers' compensation cases. The workers argued that the agency's method for determining what lawyers could charge by the hour was unfair and flawed. Read the ruling.
John A. Soubik, of the Estate of Cecilia Soubik v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor (2004) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute over survivor benefits for the family of a deceased coal miner. Cecilia Soubik's estate, represented by John Soubik, was fighting for black lung benefits after she died. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate (2 of 8), Workers’ Compensation (2 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate and Workers’ Compensation.
These published opinions sit within the broader workplace context.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Mining employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.