Federal Aviation Administration
4 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1995–2015)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Federal Aviation Administration is named as a defendant in 4 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1995 and 2015.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Discrimination, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in DC.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Federal Aviation Administration appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Abbey v. United States (2015) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved an employment dispute between a worker named Abbey and the United States government. Abbey filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims claiming workplace violations, though the specific details of what happened at work are not provided in the available information. Read the ruling.
Abbey v. United States (2015) — Plaintiff Win. Employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) claimed the agency improperly classified their work hours using "credit hour" policies that allowed the FAA to avoid paying overtime. The workers argued they performed work beyond standard hours but weren't compensated according to federal wage laws. Read the ruling.
Moncada v. Peters (2008) — Defendant Win. This case involved a job applicant who claimed the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) discriminated against them when making hiring decisions for ten different positions between 1995 and 2002. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft, Discrimination, Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Discrimination and Breach of Contract.
Published opinions span District of Columbia (2), New York (1). District of Columbia is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. District of Columbia rulings and New York rulings.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
8 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Employee v. United States Department of Labor9th Circuit · 2011 · Alaska
- Employee v. Federal Aviation AdministrationD.C. Circuit · 2008
- Employee v. Federal Aviation Administration10th Circuit · 2008
- Employee v. Federal Aviation Administration10th Circuit · 2008
- Employee v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityD.C. Circuit · 2005
- Employee v. Federal Aviation Administration and Jane F. Garvey, Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationD.C. Circuit · 2001
- Employee v. Jane Garvey, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration7th Circuit · 2001
- Employee v. Federal Aviation AdministrationD.C. Circuit · 2001
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.