Skip to main content

Long v. Card

E.D.N.Y.April 13, 1995No. 1:92-cv-05650Cited 2 times
Defendant WinFederal Aviation Administration
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Seybert
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Other labor litigation
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationBreach of ContractWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court granted the federal government's motion to dismiss all claims as time-barred under the FTCA and 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2). Plaintiff failed to satisfy equitable tolling requirements for either his tort claim for emotional distress or his discrimination and contract claims related to reinstatement.

What This Ruling Means

# Long v. Card Case Summary **What Happened** A worker named Long filed a discrimination lawsuit against their employer, Card, in federal court in New York. The case was brought in 1995, with Long claiming they faced discriminatory treatment in the workplace based on a protected characteristic. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case, meaning it did not move forward to trial. Long did not receive any financial damages from this ruling. **Why This Matters for Workers** This dismissal demonstrates that not all discrimination claims automatically succeed in court. Courts may dismiss cases for various reasons—such as insufficient evidence, missed legal deadlines, or failure to follow proper procedures for filing. This case serves as a reminder that workers who believe they've experienced discrimination need to carefully document what happened, meet all filing deadlines, and work with legal professionals to ensure their claims meet the legal requirements for court proceedings. Even strong-feeling claims may not proceed if they don't meet specific legal standards.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesBreach of Contract casesWrongful Termination cases

Similar Rulings

D. Nev.Oct 2025
Dismissed
Ricketts
D. Conn.Mar 2025
Dismissed
Johnson v. Federal Aviation Administration
N.D. Cal.Dec 2022
Dismissed
Gee
S.D. Ala.Apr 2018
Remanded
Abbey v. United States
Fed. Cl.Dec 2015
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Federal Aviation Administration RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from New YorkMore discrimination casesMore government & public sector employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.