International Longshore and Warehouse Union
8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2011–2020)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list International Longshore and Warehouse Union as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 2011 and 2020.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 5 had a mixed result, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 1 were dismissed.
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Whistleblower.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
International Longshore and Warehouse Union appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
ICTSI Oregon, Inc. v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and International and Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 8 (2020) — Mixed Result. This case involved a labor dispute between ICTSI Oregon, Inc., a shipping terminal operator, and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 8, which represents dock workers at the Port of Portland. Read the ruling.
Hooks v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8 (2014) — Mixed Result. A worker named Hooks filed a lawsuit against International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8, a union that represents workers in the shipping and dock industry. The case involved employment-related disputes connected to the union's operations. Read the ruling.
Jenkins v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union (2012) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between a worker named Jenkins and his union, the International Longshore & Warehouse Union. Jenkins brought claims against the union related to how they represented him and handled employment-related issues. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (2 of 8), Discrimination, Whistleblower. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Whistleblower.
Published opinions span California (3), Oregon (3), Washington (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Oregon rulings and Washington rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.