Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
11 federal employment cases from public court records (2001–2020)
8 with a published ruling · 3 open dockets
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority as an employer in 11 employment matters between 2001 and 2020.
Of the 7 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 had a mixed result.
Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 43% of matters with a recorded outcome.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Wage Theft.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
About this employer
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority appears in 7 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Discrimination (4 of 7), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 7), Wage Theft. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Wage Theft.
Case Outcomes
Case Stages
The stage at which courts issued Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s 7 stage-identified rulings.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.