MGM Grand Detroit, LLC
11 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2026)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list MGM Grand Detroit, LLC as an employer in 11 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Harassment, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 1 state (MI).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
MGM Grand Detroit, LLC appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Taniesha Clark-Rose v. Mgm Grand Detroit LLC (2026) — Defendant Win. Taniesha Clark-Rose worked at MGM Grand Detroit and filed a lawsuit claiming she experienced harassment and retaliation at work. She also claimed the casino fraudulently handled her complaints and intentionally interfered with her later job at another company called Zeal. Read the ruling.
MGM Grand Detroit, LLC v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers (2012) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a dispute between MGM Grand Detroit casino and the United Auto Workers union representing casino employees. The specific details of their disagreement aren't provided in the available information, but it centered on employment-related issues between the casino management and unionized workers. Read the ruling.
Salim v. MGM GRAND DETROIT, LLC. (2002) — Defendant Win. Salim, an employee at MGM Grand Detroit casino, sued her employer claiming disability discrimination, wrongful termination, and harassment. She argued that the company failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her disability and illegally fired her. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Harassment, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Harassment and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span Michigan. Michigan is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Michigan rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Hospitality & Food Service employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.