Montefiore Medical Center
39 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1999–2026)
6 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases · 5 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Montefiore Medical Center is named as a defendant in 39 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1999 and 2026.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer and 2 settled.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wage Theft, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Montefiore Medical Center appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Vazquez v. Montefiore Health System Inc. (2025) — Settlement. A worker named Vazquez filed a lawsuit against Montefiore Health System Inc., a major healthcare provider, claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that governs minimum wage, overtime pay, and other basic workplace protections. Read the ruling.
Dickson v. State of Nevada (2025) — Defendant Win. An employee at Montefiore Medical Center sued the hospital, claiming they faced religious discrimination and retaliation related to the employer's COVID-19 vaccine requirement. Read the ruling.
Marte v. Montefiore Medical Center (2022) — Defendant Win. Marte worked at Montefiore Medical Center and challenged the hospital's COVID-19 vaccine requirement. Marte claimed the mandate violated her religious beliefs and that the hospital wrongfully terminated her for refusing vaccination. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 6), Wage Theft (2 of 6), Wrongful Termination (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Wrongful Termination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.
Published opinions span New York (5), Nevada (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings and Nevada rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.