O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
82 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2008–2026)
6 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases · 8 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. is named as a defendant in 82 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2008 and 2026.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 settled, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 was dismissed.
Across 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, recorded claim types include Wage Theft, Failure To Accommodate, and Harassment.
The analyzed published opinions with a recorded state span 2 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Pipich v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (2025) — Settlement. Workers at O'Reilly Auto Enterprises filed a class action lawsuit claiming the company violated California labor laws in several ways. They alleged the company failed to give employees proper meal and rest breaks, wrongfully deducted pay for COVID-19 screenings and security inspections, and provided incorrect wage stat… Read the ruling.
Pipich v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (2024) — Settlement. This case involved an employment dispute between a worker and O'Reilly Auto Parts. The employee, Pipich, brought constitutional claims against his former employer in federal court, seeking what's called "habeas relief" - a legal remedy typically used to challenge unlawful detention or imprisonment. Read the ruling.
Pipich v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (2023) — Dismissed. Read the ruling.
Across 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, recorded claim types include Wage Theft (3 of 6), Failure to Accommodate (3 of 6), Harassment (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for other published opinions involving these claim types. Wage Theft, Failure to Accommodate and Harassment.
Published opinions span California (3), Maine (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings and Maine rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court and docket; written opinions stay grouped inside their case. List captions may abbreviate names; public records and case details can identify the parties.
Other court records naming this party
2 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.