San Francisco Housing Authority
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2017)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list San Francisco Housing Authority as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2017.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination and Breach Of Contract.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
About this employer
San Francisco Housing Authority appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Oswald v. S.F. Employees' Retirement Sys. CA1/2 (2013) — Plaintiff Win. Ralph Oswald, a San Francisco city employee, fought with the city's retirement system over his disability benefits. When Oswald became disabled and had to retire, the retirement system calculated his disability payments at a lower rate than he believed he was entitled to under city rules. Read the ruling.
San Francisco Housing Authority v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNAT. UNION, LOCAL 790 (2010) — Plaintiff Win. The San Francisco Housing Authority and the Service Employees International Union Local 790 got into a dispute over layoffs. The union claimed the Housing Authority violated their collective bargaining agreement by not properly discussing layoff alternatives with the union before cutting jobs. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination and Breach of Contract.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.