Skip to main content
Retail

Sterling Jewelers, Inc.

31 federal employment cases from public court records (20092025)

4 with a published ruling · 27 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Sterling Jewelers, Inc. as an employer in 31 employment matters between 2009 and 2025.

The most common claims on record were Harassment, Discrimination, and Wage Theft.

Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

31
Federal Cases
$5,083,333
Avg Damages (3 cases)

AI-extracted from court records; figures may be amounts at issue, not amounts paid. Not a finding of liability.

1
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Sterling Jewelers, Inc. appears in 4 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.

The cases primarily involve Sex Discrimination, Harassment, Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Sex Discrimination, Harassment and Discrimination.

Rulings span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.

Claim Types

States

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc
C.D. Cal. · Jun 2025
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
N.D. Ohio · Nov 2024
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
W.D.N.Y. · Nov 2024
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
S.D. Ill. · Jun 2024
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · Feb 2023
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
N.D. Ga. · Aug 2022
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
D. Mass. · Apr 2022
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Apr 2021
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Mar 2021
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · Sep 2020
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Mar 2020
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Jul 2019
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
M.D. Tenn. · Aug 2018
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
N.D. Cal. · Apr 2018
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Feb 2018
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Jan 2018
Open docket
Employee v. STERLING JEWELERS, INC.
W.D. Pa. · Jun 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · May 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
D. Md. · Nov 2016
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
N.D.N.Y. · Sep 2016
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
C.D. Cal. · Sep 2016
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · Aug 2016
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
2nd Circuit · Sep 2015 · Sex Discrimination
Settlement
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc
D. Nev. · Dec 2014
Open docket
Employee v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
W.D.N.Y. · Mar 2014 · New York · Pay Discrimination
Settlement
Showing 25 of 31

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.