Skip to main content
Transportation & Logistics

Stevens Transport Inc

8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20022023)

2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Stevens Transport Inc as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2023.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract and Wage Theft.

Cases were filed across 1 state (TX).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

2
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.

1
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Stevens Transport Inc appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. The most recent written decision on record:

Murphy v. Stevens Transport Inc (2020) — Settlement. Murphy filed a wage-and-hour lawsuit against Stevens Transport Inc., claiming the company failed to pay workers properly under federal wage laws. The two sides reached a settlement agreement to resolve the dispute. Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract, Wage Theft. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract and Wage Theft.

Published opinions span Texas. Texas is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Texas rulings.

These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.

Claim Types

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Stevens Transport Inc
N.D. Tex. · Dec 2023
Employee v. Stevens Transport Inc
N.D. Tex. · Oct 2020 · Texas · Wage Theft
Settlement
Employee v. Stevens Transport, Inc.
W.D. Tex. · Jan 2020
Docket closed
Employee v. Stevens Transport Inc
N.D. Tex. · May 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Stevens Transport, Inc.
N.D. Tex. · Mar 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Stevens Transport Inc
N.D. Tex. · Mar 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Stevens Transport Inc
N.D. Tex. · May 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. Stevens Transport, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
Tex. App.—5th Dist. · Jul 2002 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Showing 8 of 8

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.