Skip to main content

Stone, Inc.

19 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20112026)

1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case · 3 docket-only cases without a recorded end date

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Stone, Inc. as an employer in 19 distinct federal employment cases between 2011 and 2026.

The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

1
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 1 distinct case.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Stone, Inc. appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion on record. It comes from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus — many disputes settle or are dismissed before a written decision is published.

The published opinion involves a breach of contract claim. Browse other breach of contract rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Breach of Contract.

Claim Types

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Astor & Stone Inc
S.D.N.Y. · Jun 2026
Employee v. Mera Masonry & Stone Inc.
E.D.N.Y. · Jun 2025
Employee v. The Stone Group, Inc.
INND · Aug 2021
Docket closed
Employee v. Scotty's Contracting & Stone, LLC
W.D. Ky. · Dec 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. Yale Tile & Stone LLC
E.D.N.Y. · Nov 2019
Docket closed
Employee v. Stone
Ohio Ct. App. · Feb 2019 · Breach of Contract
Defendant Win
Employee v. Blue Water Tile & Stone, LLC
M.D. Fla. · Jan 2018
Docket closed
Employee v. Wall to Wall Tile & Stone, LLC
D. Or. · Jan 2018
Employee v. Ann Sacks Tile and Stone, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · May 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. Carmeuse Lime and Stone Inc.
N.D. Ga. · Apr 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. BR Construction & Stone, Inc.
E.D.N.Y. · Jun 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. Applebaum & Stone, PLC
E.D. Mich. · Jun 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. S & J Granite & Stone Inc
N.D. Tex. · Sep 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. FORMIA MARBLE & STONE, INC.
D.N.J. · Aug 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Island Granite & Stone, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Mar 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Island Granite & Stone, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Mar 2014
Docket closed
Employee v. Superior Marble and Stone, Inc.
E.D. Va. · Sep 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. Larry's Cap Rock & Stone, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · Mar 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. Southampton Brick & Stone, Inc.
E.D.N.Y. · May 2011
Docket closed
Showing 19 of 19

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.