Stryker Employment Company, LLC
9 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2012–2025)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Stryker Employment Company, LLC as an employer in 9 distinct federal employment cases between 2012 and 2025.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, 1 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 settled, and 1 were dismissed.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in MI.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Stryker Employment Company, LLC appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Thompson v. Stryker Corporation (2025) — Settlement. This case involved an employee named Thompson who filed a discrimination lawsuit against their employer, Stryker Corporation. Thompson claimed the company violated their civil rights in the workplace, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not available in the court records. Read the ruling.
Tristan Tanner v. Stryker Corporation of Michigan (2024) — Defendant Win. Tristan Tanner, an employee at Stryker Corporation, claimed his employer violated his rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Tanner alleged that Stryker improperly denied him job-protected leave before his child was born and later fired him in retaliation for seeking that leave. Read the ruling.
Spall v. Stryker Corporation (2021) — Dismissed. This case involved an employee who sued Stryker Corporation, a medical device company, claiming workplace discrimination. The employee, Spall, alleged that the company treated them unfairly based on a protected characteristic, though the specific details of the discrimination claims are not provided in the available in… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (3 of 5), Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Michigan (1), Florida (1), California (1), Oklahoma (1). Michigan is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Michigan rulings, Florida rulings, California rulings and Oklahoma rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.