Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
411 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2001–2022)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC is named as a party in 411 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2001 and 2022.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Failure To Accommodate, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (OH).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adams v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (2004) — Defendant Win. This case involved a Honda manufacturing employee named Adams who was fired after requesting time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Adams claimed Honda wrongfully terminated her and failed to accommodate her need for intermittent leave for medical reasons. Read the ruling.
National Labor Relations Board v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (2003) — Plaintiff Win. Employee DeWald was suspended for three days and received a counseling session after making critical statements about management in a company newsletter. DeWald claimed Honda punished him for this protected activity, which is illegal under labor law. Read the ruling.
Shepherd v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc. (2001) — Plaintiff Win. An employee at Honda of America Manufacturing sued the company claiming they were discriminated against because of a disability and wrongfully fired. The worker also alleged that Honda failed to provide reasonable accommodations for their disability and violated family medical leave laws. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate, Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Ohio. Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.