Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
406 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2001–2021)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC as an employer in 406 distinct federal employment cases between 2001 and 2021.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer and 2 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate, Wrongful Termination, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 1 state (OH).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio (2019) — Defendant Win. Honda of America Manufacturing challenged a decision by Ohio's Industrial Commission that awarded one of its employees permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. The employee claimed they could no longer work due to a job-related injury. Honda argued the commission made a mistake in granting this benefit. Read the ruling.
Adams v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (2004) — Defendant Win. This case involved a Honda manufacturing employee named Adams who was fired after requesting time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Adams claimed Honda wrongfully terminated her and failed to accommodate her need for intermittent leave for medical reasons. Read the ruling.
National Labor Relations Board v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (2003) — Plaintiff Win. Employee DeWald was suspended for three days and received a counseling session after making critical statements about management in a company newsletter. DeWald claimed Honda punished him for this protected activity, which is illegal under labor law. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate (2 of 5), Wrongful Termination (2 of 5), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate, Wrongful Termination and Breach of Contract.
Published opinions span Ohio. Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.