The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2019–2020)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2019 and 2020.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Breach Of Contract, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. v. Local Union 1430 (2019) — Mixed Result. This case involved a disagreement between The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc., a food distribution company, and Local Union 1430. The dispute centered on labor and management relations issues, including claims of wage theft by the employer. Read the ruling.
Robinson v. The Chefs' Warehouse (2019) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a discrimination claim filed by an employee named Robinson against The Chefs' Warehouse, a food distribution company. Robinson alleged that the company discriminated against them in the workplace, though the specific details of the discrimination claims are not available from the court records provid… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Breach of Contract and Retaliation.
Published opinions span California (1), New York (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings and New York rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.