The New York Times Company
14 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1998–2026)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 4 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list The New York Times Company as an employer in 14 distinct federal employment cases between 1998 and 2026.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 had a mixed result and 1 was dismissed.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Breach Of Contract, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
The New York Times Company appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Theodore Kavowras v. The New York Times Co. And Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union (2003) — Mixed Result. Theodore Kavowras, a worker at The New York Times, had disputes with both his employer and his union that went to arbitration (a process where an outside person settles workplace disagreements). He filed two separate arbitrations - one in January 1998 and another in February 2000. Read the ruling.
Querim v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2000) — Dismissed. Querim worked for The New York Times Company and filed a lawsuit against both the company and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). He claimed he faced workplace discrimination, contract violations, and retaliation for complaining about these issues. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. New York Times Co. (1999) — Mixed Result. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the New York Times Company over violations of a previous settlement agreement meant to prevent discrimination. The dispute centered on how the company handled transfers of fifteen Outside Pressmen workers to a priority job list and the creation of a new work shift that w… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (5 of 5), Breach of Contract (4 of 5), Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Breach of Contract and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
5 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.