Skip to main content
Manufacturing

TIC - The Industrial Company

8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (19972017)

1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case

What public court records show

Public federal court records list TIC - The Industrial Company as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 1997 and 2017.

The most common claims on record were Retaliation and Discrimination.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

1
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 1 distinct case.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

TIC - The Industrial Company appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:

TIC Indust Co SE Inc v. NLRB (1997) — Defendant Win. This case involved TIC-The Industrial Company Southeast, Inc., which was accused of unfair treatment toward workers who supported a union. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had found that the company illegally discriminated against job applicants who favored unions and that company supervisors made statements t… Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation and Discrimination.

Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.

This published opinion sits within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.

Claim Types

Related Laws

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. TIC-The Industrial Company
N.D. Okla. · Aug 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. TIC-The Industrial Company
C.D. Cal. · Sep 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. TIC - The Industrial Company
C.D. Cal. · Feb 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. TIC The Industrial Company
C.D. Cal. · Oct 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. TIC - The Industrial Company
S.D. Tex. · Sep 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. TIC - The Industrial Company
E.D. Cal. · Dec 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. TIC - The Industrial Company Wyoming Inc
D. Wyo. · Sep 2011
Docket closed
Employee v. NLRB
D.C. Circuit · Oct 1997 · Retaliation
Defendant Win
Showing 8 of 8

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.