Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2018–2022)
4 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2018 and 2022.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 1 state (AR).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adkinson v. Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC (2022) — Settlement. This case involved a worker named Adkinson who sued Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC for wage theft. Adkinson claimed the pizza company failed to pay proper wages, though the specific details of the alleged wage violations are not provided in the available case information. Read the ruling.
Adkinson v. Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC (2022) — Settlement. An employee named Adkinson sued Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC for wage theft—meaning the employer failed to pay wages owed under federal law. The case went to court, and both sides agreed to settle the dispute for $50,000 in damages. Read the ruling.
Adkinson v. Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC (2019) — Mixed Result. Workers at Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC brought claims of wage theft under federal wage and hour laws. The case involved multiple employees—including Wright, Adkinson, and Wimley—alleging they weren't properly paid for work performed. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wage theft claim. Browse other wage theft rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wage Theft.
Published opinions span Arkansas. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Arkansas rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Hospitality & Food Service employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.