Adkinson v. Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Arkansas
- Circuit
- Eighth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement in which plaintiffs received $50,000 in total compensation and attorneys' fees for claims that defendants willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and Arkansas Minimum Wage Act by failing to pay minimum wage and overtime compensation.
What This Ruling Means
Adkinson v. Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC: Wage Theft Case Dismissed
This case involved a worker named Adkinson who sued Tiger Eye Pizza, LLC for wage theft. Adkinson claimed the pizza company failed to pay proper wages, though the specific details of the alleged wage violations are not provided in the available case information.
The court dismissed Adkinson's case in April 2022, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the worker. A dismissal typically occurs when the court finds the case lacks sufficient evidence, was filed incorrectly, or fails to meet legal requirements for proceeding.
What this means for workers:
This case serves as a reminder that winning wage theft claims requires strong documentation and proper legal procedures. Workers who believe they're owed wages should carefully track their hours, pay stubs, and any communications about pay issues. While this particular case was unsuccessful, wage theft remains illegal, and workers still have the right to pursue proper compensation through the courts or labor agencies. However, it's important to gather solid evidence and potentially seek legal guidance before filing a claim to avoid having the case dismissed like this one was.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Adkinson from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.