Unemployment Insurance Agency
11 federal employment cases from public court records (2012–2024)
11 with a published ruling
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Unemployment Insurance Agency as an employer in 11 employment matters between 2012 and 2024.
Of the 10 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 6 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 30% of matters with a recorded outcome.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 1 state (MI).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
About this employer
Unemployment Insurance Agency appears in 10 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Wrongful Termination (6 of 10), Wage Theft (3 of 10), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft and Breach of Contract.
Rulings span Michigan. Michigan is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Michigan rulings.
Case Outcomes
Case Stages
The stage at which courts issued Unemployment Insurance Agency’s 10 stage-identified rulings.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.