Union Tank Car Company
4 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2005–2016)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Union Tank Car Company as an employer in 4 distinct federal employment cases between 2005 and 2016.
The most common claims on record were Workers Compensation, Wrongful Termination, and Breach Of Contract.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
About this employer
Union Tank Car Company appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Jack v. Union Tank Car Co. (2016) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved an employment-related dispute between an employee named Jack and Union Tank Car Company. However, based on the available court records, there are insufficient details to explain what specific employment issue led to this lawsuit or what workplace problem Jack was trying to resolve. Read the ruling.
Joseph Toussaint v. Union Tank Car Company (2005) — Defendant Win. Joseph Toussaint, an employee at Union Tank Car Company, filed a workers' compensation claim after being exposed to chemicals at work. He experienced headaches following the chemical exposure and sought compensation for his injuries. Read the ruling.
Toussaint v. Union Tank Car Co. (2005) — Defendant Win. An employee named Toussaint filed a workers' compensation claim against Union Tank Car Company after suffering a workplace injury. During the legal process, Toussaint asked the court for extra time (called a continuance) to gather expert evidence to support his case. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Workers’ Compensation, Wrongful Termination, Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Workers’ Compensation, Wrongful Termination and Breach of Contract.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.