Western Ports Transportation, Inc.
9 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1951–2024)
8 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 7 map to 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Western Ports Transportation, Inc. as an employer in 9 distinct federal employment cases between 1951 and 2024.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Breach Of Contract, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in CO.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Western Ports Transportation, Inc. appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Reno v. Western Cab Company (2024) — Plaintiff Win. Reno and other workers filed a lawsuit against Western Cab Company claiming the company stole their wages. During the legal process, the company failed to show up for depositions—meetings where lawyers ask witnesses questions under oath. Read the ruling.
Reno v. Western Cab Company (2024) — Mixed Result. A worker named Reno sued Western Cab Company over wage theft—essentially claiming the company didn't pay wages owed. A key question was whether company official Awad counted as an employer under federal wage laws. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Western Distributing Company (2024) — Mixed Result. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Western Distributing Company, claiming the employer discriminated against workers with disabilities. The EEOC argued that three company policies unfairly affected disabled employees, even if discrimination wasn't intentional. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination (3 of 8), Breach of Contract (2 of 8), Discrimination (2 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Breach of Contract and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Colorado (2), Nevada (2), California (1), Idaho (1). Colorado is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Colorado rulings, Nevada rulings, California rulings and Idaho rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.