Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC
22 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1973–2025)
9 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 8 map to 8 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC as an employer in 22 distinct federal employment cases between 1973 and 2025.
Of the 9 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 had a mixed result, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Whistleblower, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in FL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC appears in 9 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adams v. Westinghouse SRS (2009) — Remanded. Read the ruling.
Casey Ruud, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Intervenor v. U.S. Department of Labor Westinghouse Hanford Company (2003) — Defendant Win. Casey Ruud worked for Westinghouse Hanford Company and filed a whistleblower complaint, claiming the company retaliated against him, harassed him, and wrongfully terminated his employment after he reported workplace safety or regulatory violations. Read the ruling.
Ruud v. U.S. Department of Labor (2003) — Mixed Result. This case involved a whistleblower retaliation settlement between a worker and Westinghouse Hanford. The worker had reported safety or legal violations and faced retaliation from their employer. When they reached a settlement agreement, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) initially rejected it. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (3 of 9), Whistleblower (2 of 9), Discrimination (2 of 9). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Whistleblower and Discrimination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span Florida (1), Missouri (1), New Jersey (1), Pennsylvania (1). Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings, Missouri rulings, New Jersey rulings and Pennsylvania rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
9 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.