Skip to main content

Orellana v. United States of America

D. Md.September 25, 2023No. 8:20-cv-00845
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a settlement agreement resolving an FLSA collective action wage-and-hour dispute between former Gannett call-center employees and the company. The settlement was deemed fair, reasonable, and adequate after extensive litigation and mediation.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Former call-center employees sued Gannett Co. Inc., a major media company, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The workers alleged they weren't properly paid for all the time they worked, which is known as wage theft. This became a collective action, meaning multiple employees joined together to file the lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). **What the Court Decided** The case didn't go to trial. Instead, both sides reached a settlement agreement after extensive litigation and court-supervised mediation. The federal court reviewed the proposed settlement and approved it, finding the terms were "fair, reasonable, and adequate" for the affected workers. The court's approval was necessary because FLSA collective actions require judicial oversight of any settlement. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that workers can successfully challenge employers who don't pay proper wages, even when facing large corporations. The collective action approach allowed multiple employees to pool their resources and strengthen their case. When workers believe they're not being paid correctly for hours worked, they have legal protections under federal law and can seek court-approved remedies through group lawsuits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.