Mercedes v. Underground Liquidation Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed on FLSA and NYLL wage-and-hour claims by default judgment. The court adopted the magistrate judge's damages recommendation (with one exception) and awarded $177,688.62 in unpaid wages, liquidated damages, statutory penalties, and pre-judgment interest, plus costs and ongoing pre- and post-judgment interest.
What This Ruling Means
Mercedes v. Underground Liquidation Inc. – Case Summary
What Happened
Mercedes filed a lawsuit against Underground Liquidation Inc., claiming the company failed to pay her wages owed and wrongfully terminated her employment. She alleged the employer violated federal and New York state wage laws by not compensating her properly for work performed.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Mercedes's favor by default judgment, meaning the employer didn't adequately respond to the claims. The judge awarded Mercedes $177,688.62 in total compensation. This included unpaid wages, additional damages (called "liquidated damages"), penalties required by law, and interest that accumulated while the case proceeded. The court also ordered the company to pay her legal costs and continue paying interest until the debt is fully settled.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that courts take wage theft seriously and will penalize employers significantly for failing to pay workers. When companies don't comply with wage laws, workers can recover not just missing paychecks but additional financial penalties. If you believe your employer owes you wages, this ruling shows the legal system can hold companies accountable and recover substantial amounts on your behalf.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Mercedes from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.