Skip to main content

Terry v. Kennedy

S.D. OhioMarch 28, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01200
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Disability DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss and granted the plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint. Counts III and IV (state law claims) were dismissed without prejudice to allow pursuit in Ohio Court of Claims, while Count I was preserved through amendment to remove references to monetary damages.

What This Ruling Means

**Terry v. Kennedy (University of Toledo) - Court Allows Disability and Retaliation Claims to Proceed** **What Happened:** Terry, an employee at the University of Toledo, filed a lawsuit claiming the university interfered with her Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) rights and retaliated against her for using that leave. She also alleged the university failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her disability. The university tried to get the case thrown out before trial by filing a motion to dismiss. **What the Court Decided:** The court refused to dismiss Terry's main claims about FMLA interference and retaliation, meaning her case can move forward. However, the court did allow Terry to remove certain state law claims and references to monetary damages from her complaint to avoid legal complications related to the university's government status. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employees can challenge employers who interfere with FMLA leave or retaliate against workers for taking protected medical leave. Even when working for government entities like public universities, employees have legal protections and can pursue federal claims when their FMLA rights are violated. The case demonstrates that courts will allow these important workplace protection cases to proceed to trial rather than dismissing them early in the process.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.