Skip to main content

Bingham v. doTerra

D. UtahMay 22, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00707
SettlementdoTERRA International, LLC$39,018.07 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree
State
Utah

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a settlement agreement in which dōTERRA agreed to pay $518.03 in damages and liquidated damages, $2,352.00 in costs, and $37,148.04 in attorney's fees and costs to resolve FLSA claims that the company failed to account for non-discretionary bonuses in calculating overtime rates for 50 collective action members.

What This Ruling Means

**Bingham v. doTERRA Employment Case Summary** This case involved a worker named Bingham who sued doTERRA, a multi-level marketing company that sells essential oils and wellness products. Bingham claimed that doTERRA violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets rules about minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. The court dismissed Bingham's case, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without ruling in the worker's favor. No damages were awarded to Bingham. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide details about the specific nature of Bingham's complaints against doTERRA or the court's reasoning for dismissing the case. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights that FLSA claims can be challenging to prove in court. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects workers' rights to proper pay, but successfully bringing a lawsuit requires meeting specific legal requirements and providing sufficient evidence. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws should document their concerns carefully and may want to consult with an employment attorney before filing a lawsuit. The dismissal doesn't necessarily mean doTERRA did nothing wrong—it could mean various legal or procedural issues prevented the case from moving forward.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.