Skip to main content

Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations. ICA Order Dismissing Appellate Court Case Number CAAP-19-0000095 for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction, filed 05/21/2019 [ada]. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 07/19/2019. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 08/29/2019 [ada]. S.Ct. Opinion, filed 04/20/2020 [ada], 146 Haw. 354. S.Ct. Order of Correction, filed 04/27/2020 [ada]. ICA s.d.o., filed 04/25/2024 [ada], 154 Haw. 157. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 07/30/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 09/12/2024 [ada].

Haw.September 18, 2025No. SCWC-19-0000095
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed the ICA's judgment, holding that Eckard Brandes Inc. cannot be penalized for noncompliance with the DLIR's subsequent interpretation of wage classification law when the employer relied on the agency's prior official interpretation in 2005.

What This Ruling Means

**Hawaii Disability Case Still Pending After Years of Court Appeals** This case involves a dispute between Eckard Brandes, Inc., a company, and Hawaii's Department of Labor and Industrial Relations over a disability-related employment matter. The specific details of what happened to trigger the dispute are not clear from the available information, but it appears to involve workplace disability issues that required government intervention. The case has been bouncing between different levels of Hawaii's court system since 2019. Initially, an appellate court dismissed the case, saying it didn't have the right to hear it. The Hawaii Supreme Court then got involved, issued an opinion in 2020, but the legal battle continued. Most recently, in September 2024, the Hawaii Supreme Court agreed to hear the case again, meaning it's still not resolved after more than five years. This matters for workers because it shows how complex and lengthy disability-related employment disputes can become. When workers face disability discrimination or need workplace accommodations, cases can drag on for years through various court levels. While this particular case remains unresolved, it demonstrates the importance of having strong legal protections and clear procedures for handling disability issues at work. Workers should know that pursuing these cases requires patience and persistence.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.