Skip to main content

Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Department of Labor and Industrial Relations.

Haw.April 20, 2020No. SCWC-19-0000095Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Hawaii Supreme Court vacated the Intermediate Court of Appeals' dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and remanded the case to the ICA to address the merits of the appeal, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in granting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal based on excusable neglect.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Gives Employer Second Chance to Appeal Wage Dispute** This case involved Eckard Brandes, Inc., a company that was apparently facing wage theft claims from workers. The Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations had ruled against the company in some capacity. When the company tried to appeal this decision to a higher court, they missed the deadline for filing their appeal paperwork. The Hawaii Supreme Court decided to give the company another opportunity to have their case heard. The court ruled that missing the deadline was an understandable mistake (called "excusable neglect") and allowed the company to file their appeal late. The case was sent back to the intermediate appeals court to actually review the wage dispute on its merits. **What this means for workers:** While this specific ruling helped the employer, it shows that courts take procedural deadlines seriously but can be flexible when there are good reasons for missing them. For workers, this means that if you're involved in a wage dispute and miss important deadlines due to circumstances beyond your control, you may be able to get a second chance. However, you'll need to show the court that your delay was reasonable and not due to carelessness.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.