Skip to main content

Adam v. Stonebridge Life Insurance

8th CircuitJuly 15, 2010No. 09-3014Cited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Smith, Colloton, Kornmann
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for Stonebridge Life Insurance Company, finding that the company lawfully rescinded the insurance policy based on the insured's material misrepresentation regarding his medical history and that no genuine issues of material fact existed.

What This Ruling Means

**Adam v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Company** This case involved a dispute over a life insurance policy that Stonebridge Life Insurance Company canceled. Adam had purchased the policy, but the insurance company later discovered that he had not been truthful about his medical history when applying for coverage. Stonebridge argued they had the right to cancel the policy because Adam's false statements were significant enough to affect their decision to provide insurance. The court sided with Stonebridge Life Insurance Company. The judges found that the company was legally allowed to cancel Adam's policy because he had made material misrepresentations about his health when applying. The court determined that these false statements were serious enough that the insurance company would not have issued the policy if they had known the truth. The court also found there were no disputed facts that would require a trial. **What this means for workers:** This ruling highlights the importance of being completely honest when applying for insurance benefits through your employer or on your own. If you provide false or misleading information about your health history, insurance companies can legally cancel your coverage, even after you've been paying premiums. Always provide accurate information on insurance applications to protect your coverage.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.