Skip to main content

Campbell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

N.D. Okla.July 21, 2003No. 4:01-cv-00866Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Holmes, Joyner
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful TerminationFailure to AccommodateHostile Work Environment

Outcome

Court denied employer's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's ADA discrimination and wrongful termination claims, allowing the case to proceed to trial. The court found genuine disputes of material fact regarding reasonable accommodation, hostile work environment, and whether termination was based on disability versus legitimate business reasons.

What This Ruling Means

**Campbell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.** This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee named Campbell against Wal-Mart. Campbell claimed that the retail giant had discriminated against them in the workplace, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available court records. The federal court in Oklahoma dismissed Campbell's case in July 2003. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to Campbell. When a court dismisses a case, it typically means either the employee failed to prove their claims, didn't follow proper legal procedures, or the case lacked sufficient evidence to proceed. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the challenges employees face when pursuing discrimination claims against large employers. Simply alleging discrimination is not enough - workers must provide solid evidence and follow strict legal procedures to succeed in court. If you believe you're experiencing workplace discrimination, it's important to document incidents carefully, report them through your company's complaint process, and consider consulting with an employment attorney early. Having detailed records and following proper procedures can make the difference between a successful claim and one that gets dismissed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.