Skip to main content

Shane v. Albertson's Inc. Employees' Disability Plan

C.D. Cal.July 26, 2005No. CV 04-1087 AHM(CWX)Cited 8 times
Plaintiff WinAlbertson's Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Matz
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court overturned the denial of the plaintiff's long-term disability benefits, finding that the 1993 Plan applied, the de novo standard of review was appropriate, and the plaintiff remained eligible for LTD benefits because she could not return to work on a part-time or full-time basis.

What This Ruling Means

**Shane v. Albertson's Inc. Employees' Disability Plan** This case involved an Albertson's employee who was denied long-term disability benefits under her employer's disability plan. The employee had applied for these benefits because she could not return to work either part-time or full-time due to her condition. However, Albertson's disability plan administrator rejected her claim, refusing to pay the benefits she believed she was entitled to receive. The court ruled in favor of the employee, overturning the denial of her long-term disability benefits. The judge determined that the employee's benefits should be governed by the company's 1993 disability plan and that she remained eligible for payments because she genuinely could not return to any work capacity. The court applied a "de novo" review, meaning they examined the case fresh without giving special weight to the insurance company's original decision. This decision matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully challenge wrongful denials of disability benefits. When employers or their insurance companies improperly reject legitimate disability claims, workers have the right to take their case to court. The ruling demonstrates that courts will carefully review these denials and can order companies to pay benefits when employees are truly unable to work.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.