United Steel Workers of America v. Titan Tire Corp.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Gritzner
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 720 Labor/Management Relations Act
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Iowa
- Circuit
- Eighth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Union prevailed on its motion for summary judgment to enforce an arbitration award against Titan Tire, establishing that the pension plan freeze date was January 15, 1995, and that employees were entitled to increasing pension multipliers based on advancing age, and that Titan's unilateral increase of health insurance co-payments from 10% to 20% violated the collective bargaining agreement.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.