Skip to main content

GUNASEKERA v. Irwin

S.D. OhioFebruary 28, 2011No. 1:06-cv-00732Cited 5 times
Plaintiff WinOhio University$120,023.66 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Algenon L. Marbley
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil rights other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff Gunasekera, a university professor, prevailed on his due process claims and obtained an interim award of attorneys' fees of $120,023.66. He secured injunctive relief requiring a public name-clearing hearing and a declaration of liability for unconstitutional deprivation of his Graduate Faculty Status without adequate process.

What This Ruling Means

**Professor Wins Court Case Against Ohio University Over Unfair Treatment** This case involved Dr. Gunasekera, a university professor at Ohio University who claimed he was wrongfully fired and that the university broke his employment contract. The professor argued that the university stripped him of his graduate faculty status without giving him proper notice or a fair hearing to defend himself. The court ruled in favor of Professor Gunasekera. The judge found that Ohio University violated his constitutional rights by taking away his faculty privileges without following proper procedures. As a result, the court ordered the university to pay $120,023.66 in attorney fees and required them to hold a public hearing to clear the professor's name. The court also declared that the university's actions were unconstitutional. This case matters for workers because it shows that even employers like universities must follow fair procedures before taking disciplinary action against employees. Workers have the right to due process, which means they should receive proper notice of problems and have a chance to defend themselves before facing serious consequences like termination or loss of professional status. This protection is especially important for public employees who have constitutional rights that their employers cannot simply ignore.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.