Skip to main content

Toy v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Plan

D. Del.July 21, 2006No. CIV.A. 05-760-JJFCited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Farnan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Summary judgment granted for defendants on Counts I-III based on statute of limitations; Count IV dismissed for failure to state a claim under ERISA § 502(a)(3).

What This Ruling Means

# Toy v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Plan **What Happened** A worker named Toy filed a lawsuit against the Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Plan, claiming the plan broke its contract with him. The case involved disputes about pension benefits and how the plan was managed. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled entirely in favor of the pension plan. The judge dismissed most of Toy's claims because they were filed too late—they exceeded the legal time limit (statute of limitations) for bringing such cases. The remaining claim was also dismissed because it didn't meet the legal requirements for a complaint under pension law. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling emphasizes that workers have strict deadlines for challenging pension plan decisions. If you believe a pension plan has wronged you, you must act quickly. Waiting too long means you lose your right to sue, even if the plan actually violated your contract. Workers should consult with an attorney immediately if they have pension concerns rather than delaying action.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.