Skip to main content

Del Monte Fresh Produce (Hawaii), Inc. v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 142

Haw.November 14, 2006No. 27265Cited 33 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Duffy, Acoba
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Hawaii

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed the HLRB's finding that Del Monte committed unfair labor practices by refusing to bargain in good faith and interfering with employee rights, but reversed the finding of discrimination under HRS § 377-6(3). The court upheld the HLRB's broad remedial authority to order enhanced separation benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**Del Monte Fresh Produce v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union** This case involved a dispute between Del Monte Fresh Produce and its workers' union in Hawaii. Del Monte was accused of unfair labor practices, including refusing to negotiate in good faith with the union and interfering with workers' rights to organize and participate in union activities. The company was also accused of discriminating against workers, though the specific details of the discrimination claims were not specified in the available information. The Hawaii Supreme Court largely sided with the workers and their union. The court found that Del Monte did commit unfair labor practices by refusing to bargain in good faith and by interfering with employee rights. However, the court disagreed with one finding about discrimination under state law. Importantly, the court upheld the Hawaii Labor Relations Board's authority to order Del Monte to provide enhanced separation benefits to workers who were laid off. This ruling matters for Hawaii workers because it reinforces their right to have employers negotiate honestly with their unions. It also shows that labor boards have broad power to help workers who've been harmed by unfair employer practices, including ordering better severance packages for laid-off employees.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Ilwu from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.