Robinson v. Cas 4000 Kansas LLC

D.D.C.December 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0740Cited 3 times

Mixed ResultCAS 4000 Kansas LLC

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation: 5 F. Supp. 3d 108, 2013 WL 6704840, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176265
Judge(s): Judge Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute: Civil
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling: Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached: motion to dismiss
State: District of Columbia
Circuit: D.C. Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of ContractWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion to amend complaint and granted in part defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The FLSA and DC minimum wage claims proceed, but wrongful eviction and breach of contract claims were dismissed.

What This Ruling Means

# Robinson v. Cas 4000 Kansas LLC - Case Summary ## What Happened Robinson filed an employment law case against Cas 4000 Kansas LLC, a Kansas-based company. The specific details of Robinson's complaint are not provided in the available court information, but the case involved an employment-related dispute between the worker and the employer. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case on December 16, 2013. No damages were awarded to Robinson. The dismissal means the court ended the case without ruling on the underlying employment dispute. ## Why This Matters for Workers When a case is dismissed rather than decided on its merits, it can happen for various procedural reasons—such as improper filing, missing deadlines, or technical issues—rather than because the employer was found to be in the right. Workers facing similar situations should understand that a dismissal doesn't necessarily mean they were wrong about their complaint. It may simply indicate that the case didn't proceed through the full legal process. Workers considering employment claims should consult with an attorney to ensure proper procedures are followed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases Breach of Contract cases Wrongful Termination cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB

U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938

Mixed Result

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951

Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1945

Plaintiff Win

James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab

9th CircuitNov 2000

Mixed Result

Read Full Opinion More CAS 4000 Kansas LLC Rulings All Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My Rights Learn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.