Skip to main content

Oregon Teamster Employers Trust v. Hillsboro Garbage Disposal, Inc.

9th CircuitSeptember 8, 2015No. 13-35555Cited 22 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fletcher, Hurwitz, Baylson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of the defendants, holding that OTET's breach of contract claims were preempted by ERISA and that restitution and specific performance claims were not cognizable under ERISA.

What This Ruling Means

**Oregon Teamster Employers Trust v. Hillsboro Garbage Disposal Case Summary** This case involved a dispute between Oregon Teamster Employers Trust (OTET) and Hillsboro Garbage Disposal over contract obligations related to employee benefits. OTET claimed that Hillsboro Garbage Disposal breached their contract by failing to meet certain requirements regarding worker benefit plans. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Hillsboro Garbage Disposal. The court ruled that OTET's breach of contract claims were blocked by a federal law called ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act), which governs employee benefit plans. The court also determined that OTET's requests for restitution (getting money back) and specific performance (forcing the company to do something) were not valid claims under ERISA law. **What this means for workers:** This ruling highlights how federal ERISA law can override state contract law when it comes to employee benefit disputes. While this specific case was between employers and a trust fund rather than individual workers, it shows that benefit-related legal disputes often fall under federal rather than state jurisdiction. Workers should understand that their employee benefit rights are primarily protected by federal ERISA regulations, not state contract laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.