Skip to main content

In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "Erisa" Litigation

3rd CircuitMarch 9, 2001No. 99-1929Cited 1 time
Defendant WinUnisys Corporation
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Mansmann, Nygaard, Stapleton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Third Circuit reviewed partial summary judgments for Unisys in ERISA action by retirees challenging termination of post-retirement medical benefits. The court addressed ERISA's statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty claims and the scope of detrimental reliance.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Unisys Corporation retirees sued the company over changes to their medical benefits. The retirees claimed Unisys broke its promises about providing healthcare coverage in retirement and failed in its duty to properly manage their benefits. This type of lawsuit falls under ERISA, a federal law that governs employee benefit plans. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court issued a mixed ruling. It upheld part of a lower court's decision that retirees who had been retired for more than six years before the lawsuit was filed waited too long to sue - their claims were blocked by the statute of limitations. However, the court reversed another part of the lower court's ruling, allowing retirees to pursue broader claims about how they were harmed by relying on the company's benefit promises, not just claims related to early retirement decisions. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights two important points for workers: First, there are strict time limits for challenging benefit plan changes, so employees and retirees must act quickly when they believe their benefits have been wrongfully altered. Second, workers may have multiple ways to prove they were harmed when employers break benefit promises.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.