Skip to main content

Racusin v. American Wagering, Inc. (In Re American Wagering, Inc.)

9th CircuitOctober 6, 2006No. 05-15969Cited 9 times
Plaintiff WinAmerican Wagering, Inc.$2,310,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hug, Merritt, Paez
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's decision and agreed with the bankruptcy court that Racusin's money judgment claim should not be subordinated under 11 U.S.C. § 510(b) because it arose from breach of contract, not from the purchase or sale of a security.

What This Ruling Means

**Employee Wins $2.3 Million in Contract Dispute During Company Bankruptcy** This case involved an employee named Racusin who had a contract dispute with his employer, American Wagering, Inc., while the company was going through bankruptcy proceedings. The key issue was whether Racusin's claim for money owed to him should be treated as a lower-priority debt (subordinated) under bankruptcy law, which would have meant he might receive little or no payment. The court ruled in favor of Racusin, awarding him $2.31 million in damages. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that his claim arose from a breach of his employment contract, not from buying or selling company securities. This distinction was crucial because claims related to securities transactions are typically given lower priority in bankruptcy cases, while contract breach claims maintain higher priority status. This ruling matters for workers because it protects employees' contract rights even when their employer goes bankrupt. It establishes that employment-related claims won't automatically be downgraded to lower-priority status simply because they involve a company in financial trouble. Workers with valid contract claims against bankrupt employers may still have a strong chance of recovering money owed to them.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.