Skip to main content

Elizabeth Stevenson v. Abbott Laboratories

9th CircuitApril 27, 2016No. 14-55749Cited 3 times
Defendant WinAbbott Laboratories
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Silverman, Graber, Dorsey
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Abbott Laboratories, rejecting the plaintiff's claims of disability discrimination under California's FEHA and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. The court found the employer's neutral leave policy was applied consistently and that no reasonable accommodation beyond extended leave was required.

What This Ruling Means

# Stevenson v. Abbott Laboratories Case Summary **What Happened** Elizabeth Stevenson worked for Abbott Laboratories and claimed the company discriminated against her because of a disability. She also argued she was wrongfully fired in violation of California law. Stevenson believed Abbott failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her condition and unfairly terminated her employment. **The Court's Decision** The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Abbott Laboratories. The court found that the company applied its leave policy fairly and consistently to all employees. The court also determined that Abbott was not required to provide accommodations beyond allowing extended leave time. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling suggests that employers can use neutral policies applied equally to all workers, even when some workers have disabilities. It also indicates that offering extended leave may satisfy accommodation requirements under disability law. However, workers should understand that disability discrimination cases depend heavily on individual circumstances and how policies are actually applied in practice.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.