Skip to main content

Hatteberg v. Red Adair Co Inc

5th CircuitNovember 6, 2003No. M 00-51109Cited 7 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jolly, Smith, Garza
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants, rejecting plaintiff's ERISA claims regarding employee benefit plan administration. The court found plaintiff's information disclosure claim barred by a two-year statute of limitations and rejected her fiduciary duty breach theories on the merits.

What This Ruling Means

**Hatteberg v. Red Adair Company: Employee Benefits Dispute** This case involved an employee who sued Red Adair Company over problems with her employee benefit plan. The worker, Hatteberg, claimed the company failed to properly manage her benefits and didn't provide required information about her plan. She argued that company officials violated their duties as plan administrators under ERISA, the federal law that governs employee benefit plans. The court ruled entirely in favor of Red Adair Company. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Hatteberg's claim about not receiving proper information was filed too late – after a two-year deadline had passed. The court also rejected her other arguments about how the company managed her benefits, finding no legal violations occurred. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights important timing rules for benefit-related lawsuits. Workers have limited time to file claims about benefit plan problems, so it's crucial to act quickly if you believe your employer isn't properly handling your benefits or providing required plan information. The case also shows that courts will closely examine whether companies actually violated their legal duties as benefit plan administrators, requiring strong evidence of wrongdoing.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.